Talk:HMS Argus (I49)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk · contribs) 23:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

No disambiguarion links
External links check ok
Reference books there is Cheltenham, England for McCart and Tonbridge, Kent, UK for Sturtivant - for consistency they should be the same . I would suggest Cheltenham, UK and Tonbridge, UK leaving the county Kent out.
- Agreed.
The book Ships of the Royal Navy has both an ISBN ans a OCLC listed all the other just have an ISBN
- That's a template that I'm reluctant to alter.
In the Second World War section the paragraph starting Force H was recalled to the UK there are two red link operations Spotter and Picket- should they be linkd to Operation Spotter 1 and Operation Picket 1. It had to tell if its a 1 or an I?
- It's a roman I and I figured to put both Spotter I and II in the same article as the second one was a repeat caused by the failure of the first.
There is also the mixture of styles. In the lead World War I & II and as above Second World War for the section heading. Also World War I is used in the Design, description and construction section.
- Fixed. Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 12:12, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- Ok finished review, a good article on a good ship, with some minor nit-picking points, well done. Jim Sweeney (talk) 11:32, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - GA passed Jim Sweeney (talk) 12:46, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]