Jump to content

Talk:HMS Anne (1915)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 10:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Progression

[edit]
  • Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
  • Version of the article when review was closed: [2]

Technical review

[edit]

Criteria

[edit]
  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    • Missing word here: "...several Allied ships that were going bombard Smyrna, Turkey..."
    • Typo here: "...until the end of the months...", perhaps "...until the end of the month..."
    • Missing word here: "...and its primary duty was watch Turkish positions..."
    • Minor inconsistency in language as you use "Turkish" and "Ottoman" interchangably. Might pay to be consistent.
      • All done.
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    • Some large paragraphs only have a single citation at the end. I assume this is because the entire paragraph is referenced to that citation? It might pay to increase the citation density to make this clear, although I don't believe it is a requirement (suggestion only).
      • It is.
    • Consistent citation style used throughout.
    • No issues with OR.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    • Article appears to cover all major aspects.
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
    • No issues here.
  • It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    • Significant recent work, although it all looks constructive.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
    • Image has a fair use rationale and appears to be appropriate for the article.