Talk:HMS Anne (1915)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 10:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Progression
[edit]- Version of the article when originally reviewed: [1]
- Version of the article when review was closed: [2]
Technical review
[edit]- Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors (no action required).
- Disambiguations: two dab links [3]:
- Linkrot: External links check out [4] (no action required).
- Alt text: Image lacks alt text [5] (suggestion only).
- Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool is currently not working, however spot checks using Google reveal no issues [6] (no action required).
Criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- Missing word here: "...several Allied ships that were going bombard Smyrna, Turkey..."
- Typo here: "...until the end of the months...", perhaps "...until the end of the month..."
- Missing word here: "...and its primary duty was watch Turkish positions..."
- Minor inconsistency in language as you use "Turkish" and "Ottoman" interchangably. Might pay to be consistent.
- All done.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- Some large paragraphs only have a single citation at the end. I assume this is because the entire paragraph is referenced to that citation? It might pay to increase the citation density to make this clear, although I don't believe it is a requirement (suggestion only).
- It is.
- Consistent citation style used throughout.
- No issues with OR.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Article appears to cover all major aspects.
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- No issues here.
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- Significant recent work, although it all looks constructive.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images): c (non-free images have fair use rationales): d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
- Image has a fair use rationale and appears to be appropriate for the article.
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- This article looks fairly close to meeting the criteria, just a couple of prose issues and the question about citations. Happy to discuss any points you disagree with. Anotherclown (talk) 10:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- Too easy. Passing review now. Anotherclown (talk) 07:47, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:48, 27 November 2011 (UTC)