Talk:HMCS Chambly

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / Canadian / North America / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Canadian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	World War II task force

Armaments question

I know little about armaments but there seems to be a bit of a discrepancy.

Government of Canada states https://www.canada.ca/en/navy/services/history/ships-histories/chambly.html

Armament: one 4-inch (102-mm) gun, one 2-pound (0.9 kg) gun, two 20-mm guns (2 x I), one Hedgehog mortar and depth charges.

Wikipedia states Armament 1 × BL 4 in (102 mm) Mk.IX single gun 2 × .50 cal machine gun (twin) 2 × Lewis .303 cal machine gun (twin) 2 × Mk.II depth charge throwers 2 × depth charge rails with 40 depth charges originally fitted with minesweeping gear, later removed Peter K Burian (talk) 23:47, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At which point in the ship's career is the Government of Canada stating? The Flower class underwent several refits. In reality, the entire article needs a rewrite, but the Government of Canada does not state if that what the ships was armed with at the beginning of its career or at the end. The corvettes did not start out with a crew of 85 for example, due to their small size and were intended as coastal escorts. However, since they were pressed into trans-Atlantic anti-submarine service, they had radar and sonar installed and their crew size ballooned as a result. Another example is the Hedgehog mortar, which would not have been installed until deep in the war. Like I said, the article needs a rewrite and I have been putting off rewriting all the Canadian Flowers and Rivers for a while now. I guess this is the impetus I need to get at it. Llammakey (talk) 12:11, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]