Talk:HMCS Baddeck (K147)
HMCS Baddeck (K147) was nominated as a Warfare good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (January 6, 2015). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:HMCS Baddeck (K147)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 22:30, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Background Construction
Wartime career
Post-war career
Badge
Commanders
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | but the second crew shot doesn't really add anything, and the first shot is clearly part of the crew rather than the whole crew | |
7. Overall assessment. |
I'm extending the timeframe by one week, based on feedback from the nominator on their talkpage. The article will be failed on 7 January unless the review comments are addressed. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 00:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)
- The nominator changed the status to Fail, just tidying up the review. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 22:35, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on HMCS Baddeck (K147). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111104071029/http://www.shipbuildinghistory.com/history/canada/davie.htm to http://shipbuildinghistory.com/history/canada/davie.htm
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.navy.gc.ca/project_pride/ships/ship_e.asp?shipNumber=88 - Added archive https://archive.is/20120728162414/http://www.comfec.forces.gc.ca/pa-ap/nr-sp/doc-eng.asp?id=1394 to http://www.comfec.forces.gc.ca/pa-ap/nr-sp/doc-eng.asp?id=1394
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110901020427/http://www.thebattleofatlanticmuseum.ca/page15/page15.html to http://thebattleofatlanticmuseum.ca/page15/page15.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.victoriastandard.ca/uploads/3/9/8/8/3988534/page_1a_20-7.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked=
to true
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 27 October 2017 (UTC)
- Former good article nominees
- Start-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- C-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles