Jump to content

Talk:HMAS Success (OR 304)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:HMAS success crest.gif

[edit]

Image:HMAS success crest.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Double hulling

[edit]

A little earlier, and IP replaced all of the cited content in the "Fate" section. The material was attributed to the "Defence White Paper 2013" and the "CN brief to Senate Estimates hearings 2011". I have restored the deleted content, and attempted to integrate the new information. I have been able to cite some of the White Paper material, which related to the replacement timeframe (some of the information added was removed, as the White Paper did not support the claims being made). However, I am having no luck finding the information attributed to the Senate Estimates briefing, which relates to the nature and extent of the double hulling done to the ship. Any assistance in identifying the source and verifying the content would be appreciated. Content in question has been removed from the article (as it completely contradicts the cited material) and is reproduced below. -- saberwyn 12:20, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The IMO compliance conversion did not extend her service life; and was not undertaken as a measure to extend her service life. The IMO compliance conversion only double-hulled her cargo centreline tanks and converted her cargo wing tanks to carry water, thereby complying with the intent of the IMO rules without the considerable cost of full compliance for little return on investment.{CN brief to Senate Estimates hearings 2011}

Source re Commander stood aside in September 2016

[edit]

Just for reference in case anything comes of it:

HMAS Success commander stood aside after complaint from female officer Andrew Greene, ABC News, 2 September 2016.

--220 of Borg 13:00, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on HMAS Success (OR 304). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:16, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMAS Success (OR 304). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:31, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:HMAS_Success_(OR_304)&oldid=1213111805"