Talk:HMAS Harman

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMAS Harman article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Mass surveillance

	HMAS Harman is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / South Pacific

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force

Australia: Canberra / Military history Low‑importance

	Australia portal HMAS Harman is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canberra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Merge proposal

I am proposing a merge of HMAS Harman and Harman, Australian Capital Territory, becase it appears that these subejcts are one and the same: a naval base, and the suburb that the naval base makes up. Failing that, or if it can be shown that there is something to the suburb other than the base, the content of the two articles needs to be sorted out better (all the base-related content in the base article, and all the non-military content in the other. -- saberwyn 05:33, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support As a Canberran, I can confirm that the base and the 'suburb' are one and the same. Nick Dowling (talk) 11:17, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
weak support - It is good to have a complete set of suburb articles, as well as the complete set of military base articles, but a redirect should cover it. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:12, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support I have to agree with the above, separate articles for the subburb and the base. Searle, L. (talk) 11:43, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IMHO, there should be an article for the base and another for the suburb (as they are two different entities, related), adequately cross-linked and non-redundant. Regards, DPdH (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge completed. -- saberwyn 01:59, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMAS Harman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081004040941/http://www.navy.gov.au/w/images/Sea_Talk_2006-autumn.pdf to http://www.navy.gov.au/w/images/Sea_Talk_2006-autumn.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]