Talk:HIV/AIDS in North America

AIDS Top‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject AIDS, an attempt to build a comprehensive, detailed, and accessible guide to AIDS, HIV, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.AIDSWikipedia:WikiProject AIDSTemplate:WikiProject AIDSAIDS articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

North America Mid‑importance

	North America portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject North AmericaNorth America articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Removing proposed deletion tag

I created this article and put the "stub" notations on it to note it really needs to be expanded, to make a similar summary as HIV/AIDS in Asia, HIV/AIDS in Europe, and HIV/AIDS in Africa. I am planning on expanding them but I hope others will help too. Cardnl12 (talk) 18:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed

The data in this list is attributed to another WP list, which itself has dubious data and is not well referenced. I suggest that this article is not an asset to Wikipedia, and its content should be treated with extreme caution. PamD (talk) 19:00, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All data on the page is now verified and referenced, so I have removed the disputed tag. The article is still a stub though. Cardnl12 (talk) 23:15, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What a mess

This page just looks too messy to me. Why not create several larger articles combining a given region instead of having 20+ redlinks to pages that would be only a few words long? And who made that template which is only a repository of even more redlinks! Adding cleanup-reorganize to this page. Astatine211^Talk 16:28, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, this should be a table, with links in one of the cells. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.224.71.113 (talk) 01:47, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]