Talk:HD 40307 d/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Guess I'll do a clean sweep of your articles! I should have the full review up soon...
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose): b (MoS):
In the Discovery section, you say "which functions through the by measuring". I think this needs to be tweaked a bit...
- a (prose): b (MoS):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
As with the other two articles, the SIMBAD ref needs to be formatted,and the end of the first paragraph of the Characteristics section needs a ref.
- Like with the others, I will work towards finding a reference. The Internet isn't proving very cooperative thus far. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 03:31, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
And maybe it will never be this cooperative unless one of these planets hurls it's way into the Solar System in our lifetimes. Nutshell? I can't find anything...Should I just remove the information? --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 01:55, 15 November 2008 (UTC)- The problem has been resolved by Icalanise. --Starstriker7(Dime algoor see my works) 22:18, 16 November 2008 (UTC)
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A couple of reference things and one prose tweak, so I'm putting this article on hold. Let me know if you have any questions. Dana boomer (talk) 22:30, 11 November 2008 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, so I'm going to pass the article to GA status. Nice work! Dana boomer (talk) 22:28, 16 November 2008 (UTC)