Talk:HD 28185

HD 28185 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 4, 2006	Good article nominee	Listed
March 2, 2009	Good article reassessment	Kept

Current status: Good article

It is requested that an image or photograph of HD 28185 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

It is requested that an astronomy diagram or diagrams be included in this article to improve its quality. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab.
For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images.

Merger with HD 28185 b

Merge - though there really isn't any new information in that article - the only "new material" there is unsupported speculation. Chaos syndrome 11:22, 11 January 2006 (UTC) DELETE HD 28185 b article, reasons same as those of Jyril below. Chaos syndrome 18:51, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete HD 28185 b article. It is poorly written, plain wrong and there is nothing to add into this article. Make the article a redirect.--Jyril 20:05, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA Sweeps Review: Pass

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Planets and Moons" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2006. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. I would recommend going through all of the citations and updating the access dates and fixing any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:40, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HD 28185. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060929070638/http://nai.nasa.gov/news_stories/news_detail.cfm?ID=126 to http://nai.nasa.gov/news_stories/news_detail.cfm?ID=126

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia

Hello! In many articles of stars with planets i've seen a dead link in the template--> https://exoplanet.eu/star.php?st=HD+28185.--Kirk39 (talk) 19:57, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]