Talk:H-class battleship proposals/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nick-D (talk) 10:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

This article easily meets the GA criteria - great work. My suggestions for further improvements are:

The lead should (briefly) identify what Plan Z was
"The ship's radius of action was to be at least equal that of the Deutschland-class cruisers" - it would be best to specify what that was in this article to save people from having to follow the link
Assessments by historians on the merits of the various designs would probably be worth including
It would be interesting to discuss the ships' planned aviation capabilities, as these seem unusually large

Assessment against the GA criteria

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Nick-D (talk) 10:08, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing the article. I'll probably hold off on making the suggested improvements (all of which are excellent, btw) until I'm ready to take the article to ACR/FAC, but I didn't want you to think I missed the review page. Thanks again. Parsecboy (talk) 03:14, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]