Talk:H-33 (Michigan county highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough 48 72 01:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
The lead seems redundant in mentioning the route was M-135 twice. Can the M-135 mention be limited to the second paragraph, as that is where the history is described?
Well, considering that the article was moved from the M-135 title to the H-33 name, it's not really redundant. Imzadi 1979 → 03:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Was there any history to the road before 1929?

No. Imzadi 1979 → 03:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When was the CR 135 designation assigned?

Unknown. Imzadi 1979 → 03:19, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will place the article on hold for a few minor fixes. Dough 48 72 01:45, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article meets the criteria and I will pass it. Dough 48 72 03:28, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]