Talk:Gyalpo spirits

Please don't add your own opinions

User: Asasjdgavjhg, please make sure your edits are WP:NPOV, not your own opinions; and make sure that what you say is sourced. On a similar point, please don't undo other sourced edits or alter them to change their meaning. (Truthbody (talk) 16:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Moved article

I have moved the article from Gyalpo, which just means "King", to Gyalpo spirits which is what this article is actually about. I have also deleted the irelevent section "Other uses" that was there - as under this one could with equal justification include someting of every occurence of a translation into Tibetan of the Word "raja" - It is already perfectly clear from the opening para of the article that "Gyalpo" has other uses. Lodru (talk) 04:34, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lodru, while you're at it, what do you think about merging the orphaned Gyalpo Sum article to this one? Emptymountains (talk) 04:50, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Lodru (talk) 08:26, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Primary vs. Secondary Sources

Dear Yongten, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia based on secondary sources; as such, I do not have to provide the primary sources as you are requesting. That's not my job as a Wikipedia editor, as per wp:primary which states: "All interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source, rather than original analysis of the primary-source material by Wikipedia editors." Emptymountains (talk) 19:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]