Jump to content

Talk:György Kurtág

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merge: Játékok

[edit]

Aside from it being a stub, why should Játékok be merged into this article? Hyacinth (talk) 15:33, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose. Though it clearly needs sourcing and wikifying, Játékok ought to be able to sustain an independent article. Since the "merge" tags have been in place for more than a year and nobody has commented in favour of the merger, can we now remove the merge tags? --Deskford (talk) 22:00, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. It's not a good idea to merge an article about a work into a biography unless the work text is very short. I am removing the merge tags. --Kleinzach 23:29, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on György Kurtág. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:00, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]