Talk:Gwen O'Mahony

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: British Columbia / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Over-reliance on Globe & Mail article

The introduction section for this article relies heavily upon the Globe & Mail article cited from 2012, with a similar structure and rewording of sentences. This section should be heavily cut back and summarized. I'm skeptical of whether the bulk of this article was written by a neutral party. JHarlowR (talk) 00:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. In parts it feels like it was written by the person herself. Word selection seems to indicate grandeur rather than objectivity. 2001:569:BA64:800:E00E:2D4E:47D2:A2D1 (talk) 06:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]