Talk:Gwangju Student Independence Movement

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

"November 10" and Gaecheonjeol

Hi all. Article currently reads:

On November 10 — coincidentally both the birthday of Emperor Meiji (明治節) and Gaecheonjeol (Hangul:개천절, Hanja: 開天節), the National Foundation Day of Korea — students were forced to sing the Kimigayo...

Gaecheonjeol is celebrated on 3 October, not 10 November. Am I missing something here? (And, yes, I admit there is a very good chance that I am missing something here.)--Shirt58 (talk) 11:17, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Corrected to November 3, as the source talks of the 3 and no mention of November 10 is made. Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 04:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion

Unless I am mistaken, this article and Gwangju Students Movement appear to be about the same thing. Charles Essie (talk) 00:42, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Appears to be on the same thing. In fact, I encourage you to WP:BEBOLD and just blank the Gwangju Students Movement article and turn it into a redirect. It's the worse of the two, with WP:POV language, WP:UNENCYCLOPEDIC tone, basically non-existant sourcing, and a list instead of MOS:PROSE. toobigtokale (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected, given this uncontested alternative proposal. Klbrain (talk) 18:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]