Talk:Gwalior State

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles

India: Madhya Pradesh / History Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Madhya Pradesh (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in April 2012.

WP:INDIA Banner/Madhya Pradesh workgroup Addition

{{WP India}} with Madhya Pradesh workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Madhya Pradesh or one of its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the irrelavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 12:37, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image of Mahadji Sindhia entertaining two British officers with a nautch]]

An IP editor keeps removing this image claiming the article is not about the Raj. As the image is in a section about a ruler of the state who made a treaty with the British, the image does not seem out of place to me. Just restating the article is not about the Raj is no reason to censor any image including the British. noq (talk) 11:14, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree with Noq. I am responding to message at WT:IN There is enough justification above for the Image to remain on the article and this section. I find the image relevant to the topic and improves the readers understanding of the topic, by throwing more light on the relations between the two parties and the culture/dress in that period. I ahve also requested page protection so as to prevent the slow edit war going on the page.--DBig Xrayᗙ 20:22, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maharajas after 1947?

There are no Maharajas in independent India. Therefore those claiming the title post independence are pretenders. Please update this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.21.64.140 (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]