Talk:Guy Peellaert

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Comics: Creators / European Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related work groups:
/
	This article is supported by Comics creators work group.
	This article is supported by European comics work group.

Belgium Mid‑importance

	Belgium portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rock Dreams

I remember that Peellaert was the artist in a book entitled "Rock Dreams", which was a coffee table collection of paintings of rock music icons of the late 60's and early 70's. I recall that there were several controversial images (the Mamas and Papas female members were depicted naked, and the decadence of the Rolling Stones image is such that it is unlikely to be reproduced anytime soon). I don't know if there is anyone familiar enough with the book to include it in this article - or start one about it - or if it isn't notable enough for inclusion. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:57, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very notable in my view, and certainly worthy of its own article - in the meantime I've added some text here. Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]