Talk:Gutenberg! The Musical!
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Gutenberg! The Musical!. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071017155948/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/107645.html to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/107645.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
Misplaced material from Plot section
[edit]I removed this from the Plot section: "The inept play-within-a-play parodies various musical theater conventions, such as the cheery opening number, a high-octane rock song for the act one finale, kicklines, emotional ballads and an irrelevant "charm song" about biscuits sung by two supporting characters." If this can be referenced by sources, it could go in a textual analysis section. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Guest star list
[edit]Should it be alphabetized? It would be hard to verify any other order. -- Ssilvers (talk) 18:17, 25 January 2024 (UTC)