Talk:Gustave Anjou

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Anjou Controversies

Because Anjou's fraud was so complete he has become the baseline by which other questionable genealogists have been measured, however, Anjou's celebrity for what he was has also ensnared many other genealogists who are compared to Anjou.

However the rise of the Internet has also given rise to particular articles regarding Anjou and those classified with him which have been spread about like seeds to the wind. One of the outcomes of this is that people in internet situations immediately condemn anyone who was compared to Anjou as being as a grifter as Anjou was and approached his clients.

My POV is that what separates Anjou from these others was his intent to defraud his customers in lieu of their paying him to come up with the truth on their family lines. Bad genealogy research has been a thorn in the side of anyone who takes the vocation as a hobby or a profession, however Anjou's actions have tainted many a family tree whereas others who are compared to him were merely sloppy. Stude62 23:21, 31 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Gustave Anjou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:56, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gustave Anjou. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060411214600/http://personal.linkline.com/xymox/fraud/fraud223.htm to http://personal.linkline.com/xymox/fraud/fraud223.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:12, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

POV pushing

Fraud or not, you have to supply sources to support your contentions or the POV content will be removed. — btphelps ^{(talk to me) (what I've done)} 06:53, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see 3 sources cited from reputable journals that all support that POV. If you have sources in defense of Anjou that you'd like to cite, please add them. Tarchon (talk) 22:32, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Name

The article states Anjou also used the names 'H. Anjou' and 'M. Anjou'; it's far more likely these stand for 'Herr Anjou' and 'Monsieur Anjou'. As a quotation given later in the article refers to him, he clearly was known as 'Herr Anjou'.

True, but I have personally seen an English-language manuscript of his with "H. Anjou" as the byline, so regardless of what they were intended to signify, they're functionally aliases. I have a suspicion that Anjou was employing ghostwriters at the height of his popularity, so the H. and M. Anjous could perhaps be where the actual author, perhaps even not knowing Anjou's actual (assumed) first name, lazily ascribed it to "Herr Anjou" or "Monsieur Anjou". IMO, he was far too prolific to have been a single author, and this is a very common MO for forgers, to operate a factory with low paid workers producing fakes sold on the master forger's account. But this is OR, so obviously it can't go in the article.Tarchon (talk) 22:09, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]