This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Royalty and Nobility, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of royalty and nobility on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Royalty and NobilityWikipedia:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityTemplate:WikiProject Royalty and NobilityRoyalty and Nobility articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This page was only created after Gunnel died. And her death wasn't that notable, so why is she suddenly worthy of a wiki page, when she wasn't while she was alive? Arg Matey (talk) 16:56, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, but she already had a page on Swedish wikipedia. That her page was created after her death here is irrelevant. Your reasoning for deletion is flawed.--BabbaQ (talk) 17:46, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I added an infobox. If we should not allow article creation after someon's death, then begin with doing away with everyone who died before mid-January 2001 when Wikipedia was started... J 1982 (talk) 18:13, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because it can, should and was redirected to her husband's article, before redirect deleted over protocol. --Quis separabit?17:47, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It was redirected on the basis that an article can not be notable if it is created after death. as asserted by the user putting the deletion tag on the article. That is an irrelevant argument for deletion. I have started a discussion at her husbands article. --BabbaQ (talk) 18:02, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]