Talk:Gun Carrier Mark I

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / British / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biblio edits

@Duncan: Is it wise to alter the url and leave the Ethos id intact? Regards Keith-264 (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awkward sentence

Nice article. However, please look at the first sentence under Gun Carrier Mark I sub-section. It is not clear. (Why did they start in March, if they did not get GHQ approval until May? Lloyd George's action sounds like it was not connected with the approval process. Should there be two sentences?) Djmaschek (talk) 04:40, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, OK now? Keith-264 (talk) 08:51, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]