Jump to content

Talk:Gulftown

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  • I seriously doubt the Extreme version will run at 2.4GHz and cost $999, that's contrary to every Intel EE Cpu ever launched. You'd see the $1000 part go at, at least 3Ghz. --Ghaib (talk) 03:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Extreme has nothing to do with clock speed, and also the C2Q QX6700 was a 2.66GHz part, C2D X6800 was 2.93GHz. It's a $1000 (presumably) part, but it will go as fast as it can go within reasonable thermal limits, and if that's somewhere in the region of 2.4GHz, then that's what the clock speed will be. It'll still be an EE CPU, because it's the first 6-core Nehalem based CPU from Intel, and therefore will be effectively the highest end CPU, but that doesn't give any kind of clockspeed requirements. Lonyo (talk) 20:23, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There is a site testing the Gulftown CPU in a dual-socket configuration at 3.06 GHz base and overclocking to 4.5+. Intel's six-core Gulftown is performing well. Jasper Deng (talk) 19:17, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Also earlier samples running at 2.4 GHz don't mean that the final clock is going to be that. Oftentimes the final clock is much higher, and keep in mind, these testers don't always use the best versions. Jasper Deng (talk) 02:08, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fudzilla

[edit]

Contradiction

[edit]
And the Intel Nehalem (microarchitecture) article says that Gulftown's clock is 3.06 GHz and not 2.4 GHz. More on that article's talk page. Jasper Deng (talk) 01:08, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Another contradiction is that other pages in the W9ikipedia indicate that Gulftown will be sold as Core i9, not Core i7. Please resolve this contradiction if you know the truth of the matter. Allthenamesarealreadytaken (talk) 00:06, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Look at this picture. Cupy 52040 (talk) 01:24, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
If you search for Gulftown details, the most recent and updated sites will tell you that Gulftown is officially branded as Core i7 Extreme Edition, according to PCOnline.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.75.72.149 (talk) 10:04, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How can a processor be ill?

[edit]

"Gulftown or Westmere-EP is the codename of a sick six-core..."

Ok, I know that this is slang, but it seems like it's POV issue. Don't know if this should be edited, but why not make it general in that case... Perhaps change it to: "Gulftown or Westmere-EP is the codename of the ULTIMATE BESTEST EVAR, EVEN BETTAR THAN THE B4 ULTIMATE BESTEST EVAR six-core..." It would be along the same lines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.183.248.38 (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Only, in your suggested revision, it would be MOAR TRU!!1i129.2.129.153 (talk) 23:13, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Gulftown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gulftown. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:52, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Gulftown&oldid=1202502782"