Talk:Gul Circle MRT station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 08:25, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems odd to have just one claim in the lead referenced, I'd remove that from there and just make sure it's cited in the main text.
- Oh, that's because in one FAC review they wanted claims like "deepest station" or something to be cited. I might keep it up there first.
"the East West Line" Line or line? Be consistent.
- Using lowercase line.
"stacked island platform arrangement" what is that?
- Hmm, basically double island platform. Like two island platforms, stacked atop of one another
"(height) [2]" remove space. Worth looking into changing this template too so it switches from "Depth" to "Height" for elevated stations and then you don't need the awkward (height) in there at all.
- Changed parameter to "elevation".
Link Tuas in the main text.
- Done.
"four stations between this station and Tuas Link station" stations/station/station highly repetitive.
- Reword.
" S$190 million" etc, non-breaking spaces please.
- Done.
"contract includes the" included?
- Done.
"Gul Circle MRT station nearing completion." is a fragment so no full stop required.
- Done.
"Tuas South extension" the West extension had a capital E for Extension, should this one?
- Done.
"located in Tuas along" link it first time as noted above.
- Done. Removed link here
Nowhere are the "unused" platforms referenced.
- "with additional side platforms and track provisions".--ZKang123 (talk) 08:52, 24 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]