Jump to content

Talk:Guity Novin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Talk page archives

[edit]

Archive 1

Discussion

[edit]

I was asked to review this article by user Artaxerex to see if the importance rating for this article is appropriate (currently ranked low-importance). I'm not an art expert, but I do have a background in women's and cultural studies. The movement mentioned in this article is unknown to me, and I am not familiar with the artist and have not seen her referenced widely.

I do feel the article is far too lengthy for an artist who is not widely known, particularly all the details about her father's background and the detailed history of Iran at the forefront of the article. Some context would be fine, but this is far too detailed, even for an artist who might be more widely known.

I cannot adequately comment on the priority rating without more background information; however, I'd also be inclined to give it a low importance ranking. Someone who may have heard of this movement or artist may be able to provide a rationale for a higher ranking, but I cannot.

Kathleen5454 00:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kathleen5454 (talkcontribs)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guity Novin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:28, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Guity Novin. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:53, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. Community Tech bot (talk) 22:07, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

COI edits and fluffing- esp "transpressionism"

[edit]


"Transpressionism" is not an art movement and at best is just a coined term for marketing purposes, especially if it's not even notable enough for its own wikipedia article. The only citations were from her own gallery and her own website and these have been removed since this is a BLP and these are not WP:RS. In the archives of this talk page (see above), you can find a history of sock puppet editor accounts accused of peacocking. Jooojay (talk) 05:11, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

COI notices were not responded to on the editors talk pages and now have been deleted. This article has now been tagged on the talk page for COI. Do not remove these tags. Jooojay (talk) 06:22, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:51, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]