Talk:Guinness Foreign Extra Stout/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SilkTork (talk · contribs) 18:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
I'll start reading over the next few days and then begin to make comments. I am normally a slow reviewer - if that is likely to be a problem, please let me know now. I tend to directly do copy-editing and minor improvements, though if there is a lot of work needed I may suggest getting a copy-editor. Anything more significant than minor improvements I will raise here. I see the reviewer's role as collaborative and collegiate, so I welcome discussion regarding interpretation of the criteria. SilkTork ✔Tea time 18:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Listing as a Good Article. SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Tick box
[edit]GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments on GA criteria
[edit]- Pass
- Images OK. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:32, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Has a reference section. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:34, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Stable. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:34, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Prose is clear and readable. SilkTork ✔Tea time 19:35, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- Query
- Fail
Pass
[edit]This is a well researched and well organised article complying with GA criteria. Only minor attention needed to copyediting, layout and the lead (WP:Lead gives good advice regarding the lead section. As a rough rule, check that there is some form of summary of the main points of each section). This was a fairly easy article to review. Well done! SilkTork ✔Tea time 09:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)