Talk:Guilty Gear X/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 08:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

I'll have this done soon ☠ Jaguar ☠ 08:50, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Initial comments

• "It was released in July 2000 for Japanese arcades, and re-released in different versions for different platforms: Dreamcast, Microsoft Windows, PlayStation 2 and Game Boy Advance" - doesn't say when the release of the console versions were (something of a norm for VG articles)

• Done. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• "criticized for their replay value" - replay value sounds like a good thing? It might sound clearer as lack of replay value

• Haha, missed this one. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• "The Advance Edition includes tag-team" - is the game actually called The Advance Edition or is it referring to just the GBA version? I thought it must be capitalised for a reason

• Yeah, it's called "Advance Edition". Later on, "Development and release" it's clarified, isn't it? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• "Guilty Gear was successful after its initial May 14, 1998 release " - I would link the first game here as it caused me confusion to which game it was referring to

• Reworded but didn't link it here because it's linked on the plot. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• "it was about two years in development" - which game was in two years development? The first one or this one?

• Clarified. Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

• Have you got any sales figures for the PlayStation version to be mentioned in the Reception section?

• Guilty Gear X Plus is the PlayStation version. It's there. I couldn't find anything on the GBA version, though... Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:55, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

On hold

This is an excellent article, I'll wait for those minor issues to be clarified but after that this should be good to go ☠ Jaguar ☠ 11:16, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! I've done an edit. Can you take a look, Jaguar? Gabriel Yuji (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response, it all looks good and should comply per the GA criteria. I've also realised the confusion regarding the Advance port. Yep we should be good to go ☠ Jaguar ☠ 21:27, 7 April 2015 (UTC)