Talk:Guhyagarbha tantra

Article Created

Difficult to find much info on this, since most higher tantra is secret. I could use help linking this to proper pages and categories. --Dorje 00:28, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Can't get the link to Category:Tantra to work right - it shows red, but when clicked, takes you to the edit page for Category:Tantra. ?? --Dorje 00:53, 3 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that category doesn't yet exist. I've started editing a few articles in this general category (specifically Dzogchen, the Longchen Nyingthig &c) -- I'd be most happy to help out in any way I can. Zero sharp 00:45, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a scholarly translation of this tantra available, to anyone willing to contact the university and pay the price - so its not that horribly secret :) Ill check e-sangha to find that link. --Aryah 00:23, 2 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a list of sources that have extensive material on the Guhyagarbha Tantra - as well as a list of commentaries that exist in Tibetan. Some of the sources, including Gyurme Dorje's Introduction, and Dan Martin's article are available on line. Chris Fynn (talk) 20:03, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Guhyagarbha tantra. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:57, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]