Talk:Gudivada/Archive 1

Archive 1

Which district?

The map of Gudivada shows it in the Tenali mandal (in the Guntur district) rather than the Krishna district. I ask this because a new page has been added under the title Gudivada village in tenali mandal and I believe that page and this refer to the same place. I would like to correct the information on this page to refer to the proper mandal / district, and then redirect the new page here. Please comment on this talk page whether this is a proper update or not. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:28, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

new entry was correct place which was in old that place in krishna district new entry is a small village in tenali mandal and guntur district but old gudivad entry is a town and mandal which was in krishna districtusr: raviperni —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raviperni (talk • contribs) 20:52, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry that I don't completely understand Raviperni's comment. Could someone else help clarify? The page for Gudivada shows a location within Tenali mandal in the Guntur district, but the text says it's in the Krishna district. Is the text incorrect, or the map? If the text is correct, is the article about Gudivada village in tenali mandal referencing a DIFFERENT place? WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:58, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

The text showing in the wiki page is correct but the map is showing wrong. Map is showing the co-ordinates from Guntur District. 'Gudivada' is a town in Krishna District and all the text narrated in the page is all about this town only. So the map should be corrected asap. I will work on correcting the map co-ordinates.Nbsubbaiah at 22:30(IST) on 13 April 2010

Now the co-ordinates have been corrected and the location on the map is showing perfect!! This issue has been closed!! Nbsubbaiah at 19:50(IST) on 17 April 2010 —Preceding undated comment added 14:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC).

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gudivada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140714213923/http://www.ap.gov.in/AP%20State%20Statistical%20Abstract%20May%202014/2%20AP%20Demography.pdf to http://www.ap.gov.in/AP%20State%20Statistical%20Abstract%20May%202014/2%20AP%20Demography.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160309000939/http://apsrtc.gov.in/depots.aspx to http://www.apsrtc.gov.in/Depots.aspx
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160801101300/http://centralapp.cdma.ap.gov.in:8080/CDMAAPTaxesInfo/RoadDetails.jsp to http://centralapp.cdma.ap.gov.in:8080/CDMAAPTaxesInfo/RoadDetails.jsp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151227185018/http://rmsaap.nic.in/Notification_TSG_2015.pdf to http://rmsaap.nic.in/Notification_TSG_2015.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:49, 26 March 2017 (UTC)