Talk:Guardian Angels (House)

Television: Episode coverage / House Mid‑importance

	Television portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This redirect is supported by the House task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Break?

Does anyone know why it doesn't air tomorrow, but a week later? - unsigned comment from 141.10.70.74

yeah baseball.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.70.31.15 (talk) 03:42, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And the strikers.Cole (talk) 11:18, 4 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Plot synopsis

I just did the first major edit to fill out the plot synopsis. I may have gotten the order of some events wrong. So if it seems wrong, it probably is, and you should feel free to correct it. - Shaheenjim 05:37, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't get the actual flower at the last scene, maybe someone can ad it - 84.58.23.252 19:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Some species of peony. Cburnett 22:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

??

How is ergot poisining causing LSD-like hallucinations when LSD hallucinations are not frank delirium like hallucinations...

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://films-and-series.com/channels,movies,przerwane-objecia-broken-hugs-broken-embraces,Przerwane%20obj%C4%99cia%20%28Broken%20Hugs%20/channels,series,house-md,guardian-angels,1,1,60,605.html. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Minima c (talk) 07:44, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sure it's copied from there, and not the other way around? The plot has been more or less that since 2007. Looks like a website that would copy Wikipedia articles. WHOIS says the domain was registered in 2010. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 07:56, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You might be right, but I couldn't see where the website copies from Wikipedia or any other "Wiki", and I have spotted the copyright tag on that website, so I assumed that they owned the copyright which was the reason why I decided to remove the plot from the article. Minima c (talk) 09:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the development of ours, build by build, since no correspondingly large chunk was ever added or replaced. Theirs is a copy of ours, specifically, 03:10 08 February, 2010 [1] which inserted "named" before Rina (1st paragraph 1st sentence),and with its incorrect 1st paragraph 4th sentence "The applicants soon discover that patient acts", later corrected to "The applicants soon discover that the patient acts"; and missing (5th paragrah 3rd sentence) "who accepts with grace" in the next edit. I am therefore reverting the deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dru of Id (talk • contribs) 08:01, 29 March 2011 (UTC) (belated signing) Dru of Id (talk) 08:10, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I understand this now. Thanks for explaining your revert. Minima c (talk) 18:02, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guardian Angels (House). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110922063132/http://www.fox.com/house/recaps/season-4/episode-04.htm to http://www.fox.com/house/recaps/season-4/episode-04.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]