Guardian-class patrol boat is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
Someone put the article into the category Australian patrol vessels. Okay, Australia is building them, but they will be commissioned into forces of the receipient nations. Which I believe makes this category inappropriate. Geo Swan (talk) 07:31, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"The vessel is the first of 22 guardian class patrol boats which were built for the pacific patrol boat (PPB) project, of which PNG is the first of 14 Pacific island nations to have benefitted."
14 nations? I thought it was 12 Pacific Forum nations, plus Timor-Leste? I thought it was going to be 21 vessels... Has a new country signed on? Geo Swan (talk) 05:49, 5 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Arnold (2019-02-05). "PNCFG vessel named after Diro". Fiji Post Courier. Retrieved 2019-02-05. Brig-Gen Diro, who was present for the commissioning of the HMPNGS Ted Diro last Friday, along with Major General Gilbert Toropo (current PNGDF commander) saluted the gesture in what both men described as another illustration of the enduring friendship between PNG and Australia.{{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |deadurl= ignored (|url-status= suggested) (help)
I was able to get a (not very good) image of what I presume to be a Guardian-class patrol boat, but I'm unable to identify it, the hull number 05 does not seem to line up with any of the so-far launches. If anybody can identify the boat, I will nominate the image for renaming. Calistemon (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
My guess would be that it would be the sixth row of the table. The RSIPV Lata (03) has been decommissioned and expected to be replaced by the end of the year. The conspicuous "Police" branding made me look at that one in particular. Solomon Islands 03 is retiring, they still have 04, so 05 for the new one makes sense. --Scott DavisTalk11:50, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
After a lengthy absence I dropped by at Henderson again and came across another Guardian-class patrol boat. The ship in the background is the Bajamar Express, a trimaran ferries under construction for Fred. Olsen Express, the patrol boat on the right must be the HMPNGS Ted Diro who seems to have been there now for a rather long time unless it left and came back since my last visit. The one on the left I'm unsure about. Difficult to see here as I only had my phone with me, no camera, but there is a big blue and a little yellow stripe on the hull of the boat. Anybody able to identify this Guardian-class patrol boat? Calistemon (talk) 13:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, yes, the colors would match also the blue seemed a litle darker. It should be there for a little while still, hopefully I can get back and get a better shot. Calistemon (talk) 00:41, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It appears, according to this press release, that the RFNS Savenaca also carries the hull number 401, just like HMPNGS Ted Diro. When I took the above photo last month I thought the boat on the right was the Ted Diro, but looks like it was actually the RFNS Savenaca, who carries the same hull number. Am I seeing this correct? If yes, I will have to re-categorise the image on commons. Calistemon (talk) 09:31, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The "hull numbers" you are referring to are actually pennant numbers. The hull numbers used in the main article (521-) are used by Austal and the nations to track the actual vessel configurations for sustainment purposes. With that, quite a few of the hull numbers used in the main article are incorrect. Sadly, I am unable to provide an external, verifiable reference to the correct numbers. To improve the article, readers would probably prefer to see the pennant numbers rather than an esoteric hull number. As an avid naval ship (and superyacht) spotter, I know I would. :) Noisemarine (talk) 01:31, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I prefer yyyy-mm-dd dates, in references and tables. I often find well-intentioned contributors rewriting those dates into the absurd 19th Century Monthname dd, yyyy style. When queried they claim style guides recommend this style over yyyy-mm-dd. Sadly, they routinely overlook the passages in date related wikidocuments that call for contributors to refrain from unnecessarily rewriting dates and those wikidocuments explicitly endorse using yyyy-mm-dd dates where brevity is desirable, explicitly endorsing using yyyy-mm-dd in references and tables.
Yyyy-mm-dd dates sort properly, and they require less cognitive effort to read the most significant part - the year. Plus consistent use of them makes tables more horizontally compact.
In these edits an IP editor replaced the original yyyy-mm-dd dates I used with 19th Century Monthname dd, yyyy style dates, even though 19th Century Monthname dd, yyyy style dates don't sort properly.
I was going to rever the IP editor, when I saw someone else had wrapped {{dts}} around some of the other 19th Century Monthname dd, yyyy style dates. I wasn't familiar with this template, so I looked it up. It parses Monthname dd, yyyy dates, and emits hidden html that the render engine uses to sort yyyy-mm-dd style, while rendering the dates in 19th Century Monthname dd, yyyy style. That is interesting, clever, but I am not going to adopt this template when I start new tables, because I am a big fan of the keep it simple sweetheart principle. Unnecessary complications introduce more ways for things to go wrong.
Because of the cognitive effort factor, and the horizontal brevity factor, I would prefer the table exclusively use yyyy-mm-dd dates. It could be argued that very strict compliance with the recommendation to not unnecessarily rewrite dates into one's favourite format would have seen everyone else obliged to follow my lead, and use yyyy-mm-dd dates in the table.
I am not going to be a dick about this. If there is overwhelming push to use 19th Century Monthname dd, yyyy style dates, I'll yield.
Why is an article on ships built and operated by countries who typically use DD-MM-YY dating using a date style largely limited to the US? This doesn't make sense. Nick-D (talk) 11:02, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This article, like most other articles about Australian topics, is tagged with {[tl|use DMY dates}}. Almost all Australian articles display dates in that format (for example 27 August 2020), even in tables. The {{dts}} template appears to address the sorting issue on 32,000 other pages, so no reason it couldn't fix this one too. --Scott DavisTalk14:23, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with most of the changes in this edit, except its removal of the retirement field. These vessels were designed with a 25 year operational life. Their retirement is a certainty. And one of the ships of the previous class ran aground, and had to be written off, before she reached her maximum life.
I have changed the image in the infobox to one of three Guardian-class patrol boats together, taken today, something I haven't seen before. I also have added an image for the second Tongan vessel, presuming P302 to be that, also I have no reliable prove of that at this point. Feel free to revert both moves if you don't agree with me, I won't be offended. Calistemon (talk) 13:45, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I got quite a large number of images for the new Vanuatu boat today but can't find any source for an official name yet so I have only uploaded one image to Commons yet. If somebody can provide a name and source I will rename the image, create a new category and upload some more images to Commons. Calistemon (talk) 12:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
.jpg)
