Jump to content

Talk:Guanacaste Province

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The article states that usted (formal) is used instead of tú (informal) upon initial meetings. However, usted is universally used in formal situations and it is vos (informal) that is used instead of tú (informal) in several countries including Costa Rica. Am I wrong here?

Somewhat...in some parts of Costa Rica it's rare to use "tú" or "vos" and "usted" is used for second person regardless of who you are talking to. While you are right on the traditional use of this in formal and informal conversations, Costa Rican Spanish is the exception in this.--Bernalj90 (talk) 18:39, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotelguanacastecostarica.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Hotelguanacastecostarica.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guanacaste Province. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]