Talk:Guadiana

Rivers High‑importance

	Geography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rivers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rivers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RiversWikipedia:WikiProject RiversTemplate:WikiProject RiversRiver
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Spain High‑importance

	Spain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Spain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpainWikipedia:WikiProject SpainTemplate:WikiProject SpainSpain
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Also name

Respondig to the previous entry, Odiana is not a vernacule form. It is rather the correct Portuguese form, according to the systemic orthography rules of portuguese. The prefix "Guadi/Odi" both derive from the Arabic "Wadi" meaning roughly "river". If one notices it, that prefix "Wadi" in Castillian/Spanish is always transliterated as Guadi(e), therefore you have Spanish Rivers called Guadalete, Guadalquivir, Guadelupe, and so forth; But in Portuguese is gave origin to "Odi", therefore you have Portuguese rivers named Odeleite, Odiáxere, Odeceixe, and so forth. Logically, and applying the same rules, in Portuguese it is supposed to be "Odiana", not "Guadiana", which is a foreign form. However in practice that is not the case, and the form "Guadiana" is the current form and most Portuguese would not even had heard of the "Odiana" form, which is somewhat archaic, thereafter. This is so possibly due to the fact that the river is mostly a border river, and that proximity to Spain in those parts, has influenced the naming of the River, even on the Portuguese side of the border.

name

Guadiana or Odiana, both names are correct; Odiana is the vernacule form, that you may find in numerous portuguese documents, maps, for example, throughout the centuries.

Problem!

How can the river be 342 miles wide? Does it mean the basin? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.175.92.184 (talk) 20:17, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is still there, i guess it means meters, someone correct it with the right value or it should be deleted. --Iagocasabiell (talk) 15:50, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since it was impossible and also unsourced, I deleted it. The main problem in the article is that many individual claims about quantities lack citations to specific sources. It will take a lot of time and effort to track down reliable sources for all the claims. Thanks for noting this particular whopper. Finetooth (talk) 04:11, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

This sentence is not clear: "The Guadiana covers a length of 76 kilometres, 818 kilometres of travel distance, of which 578 kilometres are within Spanish territory, 140 kilometres within Portugal, while 100 kilometres are shared between the two nations; ..."

In addition, the following statement is not correct: "The river's basin extends from the eastern portion of Extremadura to the southern provinces of the Algarve;..." The Guadiana basin also stretches east to Castilla - La Mancha. In fact the river's source(s) is (are) located in that region.

--200.12.130.224 (talk) 17:00, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I deleted the 76-kilometer claim. As you say, it makes no sense as written. I have no idea what it means. As for the basin, a main-stem watershed or basin includes all of the tributary watersheds. I don't see a contradiction here necessarily. However, the watershed section, like much of the rest of the article, lacks inline citations to reliable sources that can be checked for verification. If you have access to sources and can improve the article by citing them, please do. It would be most appreciated. Finetooth (talk) 04:20, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Guadiana. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

SpainGuadianaBasin.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:02, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]