Jump to content

Talk:Groundhog/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Intrusive ferret

Why is there a picture of a blackfooted ferret on this page? (Or have I just gone 'round the bend?) Stargoat 14:24, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)

which picture did you have in mind? Neither of them looks very mustelid to me, though I am not particularly familiar with groundhogs. seglea 18:53, 28 Jun 2004 (UTC)
The one on the sidepanel [:Image:Groundhog.jpg] looks like what I've always known to be a groundhog or woodchuck in the New York/New Jersey/Pennsylvania area. The one on the bottom, [:Image:AnGroundhog.jpg] looks unfamilar. I believe that image to be misclassified. --ChrisRuvolo 16:14, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)
I removed [[image:anGroundhog.jpg|left|A groundhog peeking out from a hole]] and added a question that that images talk page. Jake 17:57, 29 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Woodchuck vs. groundhog

Why does the article consistently use Woodchuck when the title is Groundhog? If Woodchuck is the more popular name for the animal, then why isn't that the name used for the title? pomegranate 21:32, Feb 2, 2005 (UTC)

This is one of those common names that is fiercely regional. They tend to be groundhogs in the northeastern US and woodchucks elsewhere. Groundhog is probably the better article title because a slightly higher population base is likely to use the name and it's the name used for the holiday. Otherwise, I'd think it's like British vs. American spellings in wikipedia where the first use wins. --Aranae 06:34, Apr 30, 2005 (UTC)
They are almost universally called woodchucks here in New England.Marc29th 23:06, 18 January 2006 (UTC)
They're generally called groundhogs in Eastern Canada (though woodchuck is also used); marmots on the west coast. Sunray 00:32, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Marmots are a number of different critters, only one species of which is the woodchuck... As for the name of the article, I think it should be at Woodchuck, but not strongly enough to throw a fit about it. Most people know the name "groundhog" only because of the holiday. Tomertalk 03:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

More photos

Would some Wikipedians of the area try to get some photo shots? David.Monniaux 11:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

The two current pictures are good (lying down and sitting/standing up on hind end) but it would be good to have an additional picture of walking/running. 69.87.200.242 18:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

What about "land beaver"? Shouldn't that be added as an a.k.a.?Periksson28 (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

The External links are dead.76.29.224.76 (talk) 01:12, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

They have been fixed. Dger (talk) 03:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Dog Picture

Considering the dog is tied up in the picture. Shouldn't it says the dog is receiving the unexpected visit from the groundhog and not the other way around?

We should actually get rid of the picture altogether--it's just ... "bad". The caption is another matter entirely; the idea that either one of the animals is "visiting" the other is cute writing suitable for the community page for a small newspaper, but ridiculously unencyclopedic. Tomertalk 03:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


The picture is gone now, which is probably good. My dog "visited" a woodchuck in the local cemetery today...which ended up with one more corpse in the graveyard.

Freeways and interchanges

What is this nonsense about freeways and interchanges? It sounds like it was written by someone [young] who happened to see a woodchuck alongside the road once. Until someone can demonstrate that there's some relevance to freeways in the distribution of woodchucks, I'm taking it out of the article. Tomertalk 03:46, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

I'm from Ottawa, and I've seen *a lot* of groundhogs along some of the big roads. My guess is that this partly because is there's a lot of grass, and not many other animals bug them. But I don't know what you'd be able to cite.

Squeaver

On the basis of this google search, I'm removing the "or squeaver" business from the article. It appears to be an idioletic neologism, and without looking, I'm guessing was added by the person with the golden retriever... Tomertalk 04:00, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Tongue twister

The way I always had people relate the second part of that quoted tongue twister was: 'A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.'
Is this just differing regional variations or what?

That's better than the one in the article, which has very clumsy timing: A woodchuck would chuck all the wood that a woodchuck could if a woodchuck could chuck wood. That's awful.

And both of those are different to what I learned. This is shorter but flows well: 

How much wood would a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? 
It would chuck as much as a woodchuck would if a woodchuck could chuck wood!

I believe the article's version should be replaced with either the one above or this one. 89.243.88.127 21:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

No problem, just need to provide a source, there are multiple variations, but Wikipedia is not the place to let loose with poetic creativity, see WP:OR. -- —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stbalbach (talk • contribs) 15:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC).
The version quoted above ('A woodchuck would chuck all the wood he could chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood.') seems to appear in various sources and appears to be a common rhyme (question and answer together). I've updated the document to show that, with some of the other completions shown as alternatives. Stbalbach is correct -- we are here to point to creditable sources not to compose our own endings to the rhyme! Mooncow (talk) 14:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

Article Adjusted

I've moved around some of the text and created another section in the article. For now, behavior and anatomy are in the new section. Hopefully the article will be expanded a bit, allowing for more organization. BioTube 21:05, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

Male/Female size ratio?

Does anyone know if females are generally larger or smaller than males? I'm trying to better identify some local groundhogs which seem to differ a lot in size. -- Stbalbach 03:59, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

There's no size difference unless you get a pregnant female. Whitaker and Hamilton (1998) report a study where 64 males were 475-673 mm (mean = 599) long with a weight of 2.2-5.3 kg (mean = 3.5) and 74 females were 440-700 mm (mean = 595) with a weight of 2.0-5.9 kg (mean = 3.5). --Aranae 04:08, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Ok thanks, Aranae! -- Stbalbach 04:13, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Whistle pig

I added that groundhogs are also known as whistle pigs in British Columbia. It's true, though, why do you think whistler is called whistler, from whistlepigs.

I removed any mention of geographic usage of the term from the lead section because it just encourages anyone who has heard the term in their part of the world to add an "also in.." which is really just original research - word usage across geography is very complex and it's probably been used all over the place. It's too much detail for the opening section. -- Stbalbach 14:15, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

should we add that whistle pigs whistle, though it seems obvious from the name...but yeah they do whistle...hence whistler, British Columbia

Which one is the whistle pig, then? The article for hoary marmot also lists that as being called the “whistle pig”… —Wiki Wikardo 11:01, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

I've also heard guinea pigs referred to as "whistle pig"--that's possibly just someone's idiosyncratic usage though. 12.151.138.194 (talk) 11:40, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Image caption

It is clear that User:Stbalbach and I are in a revert war over the caption for Image:Groundhog-Standing2.jpg. The intial caption read "Groundhog standing erect." Stbalbach changed the caption to read "Groundhogs graze on a salad of vegetarian variety." I find the new caption objectionable because the groundhog in the image is not feeding, it is in an alert posture, the use of the term "salad" is just strange in this context, the term "vegetarian variety" is also very awkward, and the statement overall is quite informal. If standing erect is not desired, perhaps "Groundhog in alert posture" or "Groundhog surveying its surroundings". Instead of violating the three revert rule, I invite other editors to comment. --Aranae 04:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

There is no reason to use valuable caption space to state the obvious "A groundhog standing" - this is not simple.wikipedia. If that is all that can be said about it, have no caption at all, it is banal and lowers the quality of the article. As for the term "salad" it is an idiom which simply means what everyone knows it to mean: a variety of green leafy plants. This is a valuable addition to the article since no where else in the article does it talk about what groundhogs eat. In fact the caption could be expanded or better defined to be more specific - do they eat meat? (I know some marmots will eat meat). Anyway image captions should ideally be linked to the content of the article in some meaningful way. -- Stbalbach 14:18, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

From mammal fact sheets: Woodchuck. [1] "Woodchucks seem constantly on the alert when outside their burrows and give a shrill warning whistle when alarmed." I wonder if this information would serve as a basis for an informative caption? --Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

That would also serve to address the statement made in the prior section of this talk page and sounds good to me. I would prefer that to the caption I just added about diet since the animal in the picture is on alert and not foraging. --Aranae 04:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Mindful of Stbalbach's comment above, I moved the foraging caption to the young groundhog image; it doesn't show youth distinguishing features (or if it does, they are not called out), the individual is amongst vegetation, and the original caption wasn't very informative. I may have tried to include too much in the erect posture caption. Please trim or reword as you see fit. Walter Siegmund (talk) 04:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Just FYI, the groundhog was foraging until I interrupted it. Not that it really matters. :P --Marumari 04:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Can they really chuck wood???

I keep hearing that a woodchuck cannot chuck on wood, but all chucking is is quickly consuming on wood. Do any of you believe or know as to whether a woodchuck can or cannot chuck on wood, or is this all just a myth? JustN5:12 01:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Groundhogs don't chuck wood. Chucking would be taking small pieces out of a larger piece. They might eat a twig if its soft enough and they are hungry enough, but I suppose anyone would. -- Stbalbach 15:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

I would like to point out that though the woodchuck's name probably started as wuchak as the article stated.....It can not be dismissed that the name woodchuck has nothing to do with wood or 'chucking'. The fact is that wood piles that people kept year round for cooking and heating have always been a favorite denning place. Well actually under them. Because an opening anywhere in the pile would provide multiple exit points, and the animal can actually crawl into the pile in order to dig, while the pile itself protects the animal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.121.253.98 (talk) 00:48, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Odd sentence

These bones make them able to survive direct blows to the head that would cripple other mammals of the same body mass.

This odd statement should probably have a direct citation and/or some explanation of why it's important. —BryanD 22:27, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Anatomy and behavior

Volume excavated.[dubious – discuss]

Given a cubic metre of water weighs 1 tonne -approx 1 ton, I'm very surprised that this appears equated to 320kg of earth. I would have expected the density of most soils to be more than water even allowing for air between lumps. JRPG (talk) 22:11, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed : [[2]] ; I came here to write about that. 82.163.24.100 (talk) 15:51, 2 February 2010 (UTC)

If the soil density were greater than that of water density, surface tension would prevent water from penetrating soil. 76.98.121.196 (talk) 04:03, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Killing Groundhogs

They are much harder to drown than kittens. I wish someone would give directions on skinning and removing the scent glands and add some recipes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.19.221.127 (talk) 00:21, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

do groundhogs ingest rocks for some reason? i see them at the side of the road frequently.68.63.170.200 (talk) 14:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Does anyone know how to eradicate them? I live in Wisconsin and because I have such poor drainage had to put in a mound system for our waste water. A family of woodchucks decided to move in and dug quite a deep hole right in the side of the mound leaving a very, very large pile of sand just below the entrance. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.207.240.10 (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Be careful while trying to get rid of them. While I would not advise killing them for any reason except major ones, I have to say that my cousin once shot one with a .12 gauge rifle, and when he picked up the body, which he thought dead, the marmot turned around and bite his thumb off, he had to pick it off the ground and race his car to the hospital to have it stitched back on. Up to this day, 30+ years later, he still has no sensitivity whatsoever in his thumb... CielProfond (talk) 03:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
That's why you hit it with a .223 round or higher. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.177.132.124 (talk) 05:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

We shoot them on sight but they can be elusive. Also, my sister complains about killing them and has insisted that we use Have-a-Heart traps - so far we've caught two of them this way. She usually drives them across the river and lets them go to terrorize the poor folks on the other side. Maybe there should be a section in the article on the significance of the woodchuck as an agricultural pest, but I only have anecdotal evidence and can't cite any authority. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.71.216.244 (talk) 02:49, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Groundhog geographic distribution

One of the 'related links' at the bottom of the page showed a geographic distribution that did not include North Carolina. But I can tell you for a fact that groundhogs are in North Carolina since there's one (at least) living under the decking of my house in Raleigh, NC. 14:12, 12 June 2008 (UTC)~ Larry Grossman

The opening says "Groundhogs are found as far north as Alaska, with their habitat extending south to Idaho." Groundhogs are found in many places south of Idaho. Any source for this? Chromaone (talk) 21:19, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

My Video of Ground Hog Feeding

I have a really nice video of a ground hog feeding, if the moderator of this page would like me to post it. Please tell me how to do so. It can be seen here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=16C3TWx1RYE Thank you ~KineticRic —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.61.208.9 (talk) 17:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Maps of habitat

Is there any maps of the habitat of this animal and others? Many encyclopedia's have these kind of maps.

I found that other animals have habitat maps: With the Template:Taxobox with the range_map section. travb (talk) 18:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Here is a map of ground hogs area: [3] it would be quite easy to create a map like this and add it to this article. travb (talk) 18:17, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

42 pounds???

Under the "human relevance" topic, what exactly does "42 pounds" mean? is this correct( and where is the citation) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.6.32.111 (talk) 05:32, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

2 babies, no mom.

I live in rural Kentucky and am quite familiar with the groundhog. Most people in the area call them a pest or nuisance and do their best to kill any they spot, even swerving deliberately to the shoulder of the road to hit them. And to my horror, have filled a den full of gas and set it ablaze, only to shot any that make it to an exit. Last week, while working in our garden, my husband and I spotted a very large groundhog helping with the yard work by munching on a patch of clover that grows near the creek that flows down the middle of our property. We sat and watched the creature for sometime, then went back to our business. When we finished and stood up, the groundhog spotted us and stood to get a better look. We stood there starring at each other for a few minutes. We, admiring the new resident on the property and it, sizing us up to see if we were a threat. Never in a million years! Well, the very next morning, I spotted the groundhog, dead on the side of the road. I was very upset and hurt that "our" groundhog had suffered the fate of many an unlucky groundhog. Today, almost a week later, I saw 2 babies in the same patch of clover and immediately googled to find out exactly what these creatures eat and how they behave. It stated that the pups are born late March, early April and do not leave the den for 5-6 weeks. It also stated that the pups stay with their mother for several months. It is obvious to me after reading the article, that these pups are very young and have been forced by hunger to leave the den much earlier than they normally would. Question: Is there anything my husband and I can do to help these pups or should we just cross our fingers and hope for the best and let nature take it's course? Thank you in advance for any help. 68.217.187.187 (talk) 22:24, 18 May 2009 (UTC) S. Turner

Responded on user's talk page. -kotra (talk) 23:07, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

One more rejoinder

If a woodchuck could chuck wood he would

Chuck as much wood as a woodchuck could. --71.207.122.174 (talk) 19:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Rodents

This is a notice to inform interested editors of a new WikiProject being proposed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Rodents --ΖαππερΝαππερ BabelAlexandria 02:04, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

geographic distribution

The Groundhogs natural range stetches from Alaska southwest through Georgia. (national geographic) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.157.240.80 (talk) 23:46, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

That was my only comment. I live in North Georgia. I had actually never even seen a groundhog till I moved here. Where it seems like you can't drive down the highway without seeing atleast one on the side of the road happily eating lunch. Here it seems like they enjoy making their burrow in all of the wild patches of kudzu and ivy where they can be hidden. The groundhog in my backyard enjoys a very large burrow in the ivy that grows rampant in my backyard. I looked up groundhogs because although I see them everyday the one currently residing in my yard I usually spot at night ( early morning) but that may be because of my kids, soccer balls frequently flying past his burrow and our dog. I wanted to see if they usually have any nocturnal habits. 166.137.15.155 (talk) 12:13, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

hydration for groundhogs

I have noticed many groundhogs in my area, burrowing in fields or in/on the edge of wooded areas. i have not noticed many sources of water in the area. do they drink, or get enough hydration from the vegetation they consume? Chuck1974 (talk) 19:09, 2 May 2010 (UTC)chuck1974

I was reading the section of the article about how groundhogs don't drink, and there's an image of a groundhog drinking from a bird bath right next to it.

GROUND HOG VISION

DO GROUND HOG'S HAVE GOOD VISION? CAN THEY SEE AT LONG DISTANCE OR ARE THEY LIMITED TO CLOSE UP? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.171.0.140 (talk) 01:24, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

They can only read Wikipedia content that is in ALL CAPS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.115.31 (talk) 20:41, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
My experience is that if you come within 30 metres of them they go "on alert" (i.e., they watch you). Approach any closer and they scurry for their holes. DGERobertson (talk) 01:36, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

I WILL say that they're FAR faster than appearances would suggest. I've been around them for ages, while I was doing things military in the forest, never had one run off, as they fed away from our area. Today, I watched one run down the driveway, as we came out of our southeast Pennsylvania home. While, a cat or dog could easily outrun it and catch it, it would be a bit of work for a cat to catch it. Tomorrow, to map out their burrow holes. Found one already. Then, see about putting cameras near them. And discouraging them from TOTALLY eating the garden foods... 76.98.121.196 (talk) 04:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The link to the Missouri Conservation Commission is broken but I found a new one: http://mdc.mo.gov/discover-nature/field-guide/woodchuck-groundhog Davest0r (talk) 20:38, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I added it. Dger (talk) 03:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Mass of dirt ?

The article has: move approximately 1 m3 (35 cu ft), or 320 kg (710 lb), of dirt when digging a burrow That would mean that 1 liter of dirt weighs 320 g. That is less than water ? Can anybody confirm this rather odd massdensity of dirt ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.159.60.67 (talk) 10:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

One website lists dirt as 120 lb/cu ft. The above density is about 20 lb/cu ft. That is very light dirt. Dger (talk) 20:42, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
I think the whole sentence is suspect. There is no citation. The Wild Mammals of Missouri (Charles Walsh Schwartz, Elizabeth Reeder Schwartz, Missouri. Dept. of Conservation, 2nd Ed.) has a comment: 'The subsoil removed in the course of digging one burrow amounted to 716 pounds.' No mention of volume or averages. Orenburg1 (talk) 09:06, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Do they really survive longer in the wild?

I have a question about the following sentence:

Groundhogs usually live from two to three years, but can live up to six years in the wild.

Given that they are a highly predated animal, I suspect that that this sentence should say "can live up to six years in the captivity". I know nothing about groundhogs so I decided to appeal to your better judgement instead of just changing it. What do you think?

--Reverie (talk) 04:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

The American Society of Mammalogists account says 4 to 6 years in the wild citing papers by Grizzel and Hamilton, altho Grizzel actually says 5 to 6 years. I havent read Hamilton's account. The same account says max longevity in captivity is 9 yrs 8 months but AnAge says 14 years in captivity. I would not give any credence to accounts of Wharton Willie's longevity. Orenburg1 (talk) 16:20, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

I have updated the text and added an attribution for the willie claim - you can ad the refs for the above, or give full citations and I will - I don't know what AnAge is. μηδείς (talk) 18:22, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Sound File

I added a sound file of a warning call from wikimedia commons to the image of the ground hog on its hind legs. My computer cannot play it, which may just be my cheap PC. Please remove the file if it causes problems. μηδείς (talk) 19:31, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Works fine on my computer. Dger (talk) 22:13, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Not working on my OS X box. Haven't checked it on my PC. Got a frozen image, zero sound. Java thing? 76.98.121.196 (talk) 04:23, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

It's probably none of my business, but if I tried to genetically cross one of these creatures with the other, more predatory equally aquatic counterparts, would it work? And if it did work, what would I call it? Muskhog? Groundrat? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.18.255.225 (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

It almost certainly won't work; they've each had >50 million years of separate evolution and probably have accumulated a lot of reproductive isolation-inducing mutations in that time. Ucucha 02:19, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Hibernation

I thought that woodchucks hibernate in snowy climes.

72.82.179.246 (talk) 18:56, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Yes indeed they do. See section called Behaviour. Dger (talk) 03:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Map Not Right

I live in Washington State west of where the range map shows groundhogs. We have a lot of groundhogs! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 140.194.140.19 (talk) 19:58, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Marmota monax UL 04.jpg to appear as POTD

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Marmota monax UL 04.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on February 2, 2015. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2015-02-02. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:38, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

Groundhog
Groundhogs (Marmota monax) are rodents in the family Sciuridae. They belong to the group of large ground squirrels known as marmots. This lowland creature is widely distributed in North America and common in the northeastern and central United States and Canada. Although considered by farmers to be a nuisance, groundhogs have become part of popular culture through Groundhog Day and the film of the same name.Photograph: Cephas
Archive – More featured pictures...

Movie Reference

I deleted the line that said "A groundhog figures prominently in the movie Groundhog Day," because the movie is referenced, with link, halfway through the paragraph preceding it.Sadiemonster (talk) 09:04, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

prairie badger

What is meant by "prairie badger"? An American badger, prairie dog or yellow-bellied marmot? JMK (talk) 16:02, 25 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Groundhog. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

I commend listing man as threat, not "dubious".

I commend the listing of man as a principle enemy or threat to a wild animal. This is the principle element of the great extinction which is in progress and characterises the Anthopocine. It should be a common comment, there is nothing at all "dubious" about it, leave it in! Justinmo 2018Feb01 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinmo (talk • contribs) 12:02, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Eating groundhog

This needs to be corrected: "In some parts of Appalachia, they are eaten." If you read the source article, it is actually talking about hunting and eating groundhogs in coastal Massachusetts. I'd be glad to change it to "In some parts of Massachusetts, they are eaten" unless someone else wants to fix it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abundren (talk • contribs) 01:29, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Please add a section on groundhog as a vector for disease

If you have time and knowledge, it is not mentioned anywhere in the article for example that groundhogs often carry rabies.

Thank you. Golem Unity (talk) 16:17, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Correct spelling

Hello @Kinu: I thought I would "correct" your correction {{not a typo|ab|ut}} but I wonder if that is deliberate. Is the | meant to be in the middle there? Does that keep people searching for about typos from finding this? Invasive Spices (talk) 31 January 2022 (UTC)

  • Hello! You are correct in that it is intentional, per the documentation for the template. It prevents automated editing tools (i.e., one that is designed to scan for "abut" and change it to "about") such as WP:AWB from matching the word directly and incorrectly changing it. --Kinu t/c 22:59, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
I see. One would think {{not a typo}} alone was sufficient to stop people but ... Invasive Spices (talk) 1 February 2022 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Groundhog/Archive_1&oldid=1091532514"