Talk:Grok (chatbot)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 8 November 2023 by reviewer Gobonobo (talk · contribs).

Artificial Intelligence

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Artificial Intelligence, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Artificial intelligence on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Artificial IntelligenceWikipedia:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceTemplate:WikiProject Artificial IntelligenceArtificial Intelligence articles

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Written in Rust

The sidebar says "Written in Rust" citing a primary source (https://x.ai/). Is this not contrary to Wikipedia guidelines? Do we not require a secondary source? Tadreidms (talk) 21:02, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No, WP:PRIMARY is fine for straightforward, descriptive statements of facts that can be verified by any educated person with access to the primary source but without further, specialized knowledge. It's only when primary sources start getting promotional, contentious or potentially libelous that it becomes a problem. Belbury (talk) 21:09, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Licence

The licence redirects to open software wikipedia page I am unable to understand is this a typo or something else , it should redirect to 'apache' wikipedia Steven Willers (talk) 11:49, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done, target should have been Apache License. Belbury (talk) 14:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]