Talk:Grob G 120TP
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grob G 120TP article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Wiki data on G120TP is out of date and inaccurate. Edits to correct have been deleted
[edit]EASA has released certification documentation that demonstrates the Wiki Spec for the G120TP is out of date. http://easa.europa.eu/document-library/type-certificates/easaa565-0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecojet (talk • contribs) 19:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Relevant comparable aircraft links
[edit]Wiki currently reads like an advertorial for the Grob 120TP and has only 3 links to less than comparable aircraft.
Attempt to add more relevant info was deleted, namely the "see also" links:
Pilatus PC7 Mk2: a direct competitor in Indian Air Force trainer competition: http://www.pilatus-aircraft.com/#45
Aermacchi SF260TP: Same role, same engine as Grob 120TP: http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/pictures-alenia-aermacchi-offers-new-generation-sf-260tp-381613/
RFB Fantrainer FT600 / Fanjet: Same engine and same role and same aerospace industry (Germany) as G120TP: http://www.fanjetaviation.com/
CT4 Trainer as used by RAAF and RNZAF in competition with G120TP for UK's MFTS: http://www.aerospace.co.nz/aircraft/ct-4-airtrainer/description
BlackShape 115: CRFP +6.5/-3G aerobatic two seat trainer: http://www.blackshapeaircraft.com/en/training-systems.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ecojet (talk • contribs) 19:29, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
- The problem wasn't with the choice of comparable aircraft, the problem was you added only redlinks to the "see also" section. Redlinks are not used in the "see also" section, because a reader can't "see also" an article that doesn't exist. - Ahunt (talk) 13:41, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:37, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2022 (UTC)
