Talk:Grinling Gibbons

Note of some carvings

Just a note to avoid confusion:

• In 1691/93 Gibbons carved the altar for the chapel of Trinity College, Oxford
• Around 1691-1695 he also carved decorations for the Wren Library of Trinity College, Cambridge

There also seems to be a number of other significant events that could do with mentioning (these need checking)

• Decoration for Chatsworth House
• the ceiling for a room at Petworth House
• Carvings in the Great Hall of Blenheim Palace (1716)

-- Solipsist 20:41, 26 July 2005 (UTC)

Category for his work?

Is it worth having a category "Buildings bearing Grinling Gibbons carvings"? Pseudomonas_(talk) 19:45, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Material from 1877

In case it's useful, most of the following is verbatim from the stated 1877 source. The Hampton Court article already mentions his work there. -- SEWilco (talk) 02:34, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• The most important feature of this era in furniture and decoration was the appearance of the carved work of Grinling Gibbons and his pupils, chiefly executed on the frames of mirrors, on panels and mantelpieces. There had been nothing exactly like it before, and there has been nothing comparable to it since. After its worth was recognized, it was used wherever it could be had, in church, palace, and cathedral It was carving of the naturalistic order, but with a symmetrical arrangement of the objects and a faultless finish. "The flowers and foliages of his groups or garlands sweep round in bold and harmonious curves, making an agreeable whole, though for architectural decorative carving no work was ever so free from conventional arrangements. His animals or his flowers appear to be so many separate creations, from nature, laid or tied together separately, though in reality formed out of a block, and remaining still portions of a group cut in the solid wood." This copying of natural forms, as executed with the marvelous technique of Gibbons — his grace, his dexterity, and his matchless truthfulness — has a value of its own entirely independent of its relation to other forms of art. "This day," writes Evelyn in his diary on January 18, 1671, "I first acquainted his Majesty with that incomparable young man Gibbons, whom I had lately met with in an obscure place by mere accident, as I was walking near a poor solitary thatched house in a field in our parish near Sayles Court. I found him shut in, but looking in at the window I perceived him copying that large cartoon or crucifix of Tintoretto, a copy of which I had myself brought from Venice, where the original painting remains. I asked if I might enter; he opened the door civilly to me, and I saw him about such a work as, from the curiosity of handling, drawing, and studious exactness, I had never before seen in all my travels. I question him why he worked in such an obscure and lonesome place; he told me it was that he might apply himself to his profession without interruption, and wondered not a little how I found him out. I asked if he was unwilling to be made known to some great man, for that I believed it might turn to his profit. He answered he was yet but a beginner, but would not be sorry to sell off that piece. On demanding the price, he said one hundred pounds. In good earnest, the very frame was worth the money, there being nothing in nature so tender and delicate as the flowers and festoons about it, and yet the work was very strong. In the piece was more than one hundred pieces of men." The carving of Gibbons that was first carried to the queen in order to secure her favor did not chance to please a certain old woman who had the royal ear, and it was not at once that the artist obtained the consideration which was his due; he has, however, enjoyed it ever since, and his work is still held among the treasures of English art. Some of the best and most interesting of it is at Hampton Court Palace and at Chatsworth House; and the school of carvers that followed him decorated all London with such masterly work that it is plain that if here had been any artist capable of designing, as there were carvers capable of executing, it would have been a mighty period of decorative art.
• "Elizabethan and later English furniture". Harper's New Monthly Magazine. 56 (331): 27–28. 1877-12. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)

Sayles Court above is no doubt the now Sayes Court, where Evelyn had a house and garden, leased from King Charles II.

Claverhouse (talk) 17:37, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grinling Gibbons. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141124134109/http://www.stgeorges-windsor.org/archives/archive-features/image-of-the-month/title1/the-beaufort-chantry.html to http://www.stgeorges-windsor.org/archives/archive-features/image-of-the-month/title1/the-beaufort-chantry.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Why no mention of him being famous for incorporating pea pods into his carvings?

Why no mention of him being famous for incorporating pea pods into his carvings? - Just that this is the only thing I already knew about him beforehand! Invulgo (talk) 08:37, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

I have added two sentences on this... there's a lot of mythology surrounding the pea pods, not much of which is true I think. Godtres (talk) 17:49, 16 September 2024 (UTC)