This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Oppose. Here it all comes down to standard practices and preferences in English Wikipedia. In Romanian Wikipedia, and in Romanian in general I would say, quotes are usually used in cases like this. You can see many cases of this type at here [1]. On the other hand, in English Wikipedia, not sure if in English in general, quotes are removed in proper names, as you can see here [2]. Why these preferences? They probably originate from extensive discussion that took place one or two decades ago, with WP:TSC being a reflection of that. I think we should maintain the existent consistency for the sake of harmony among articles (WP:CONSISTENT) and see no need for an exception. I'd instead favor discussion at the policy's talk page if desired. Both options may be more appropriate for one reason or another but only one is backed by policy right now. Super Dromaeosaurus (talk) 23:34, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Super Dromaeosaurus: That makes sense, I hadn't really looked into other Romanian museum articles so I hadn't really considered whether they too would need quote marks in some of their titles or not. I won't withdraw this proposal for now though, in case maybe there is a good argument for making this move anyway. Monster Iestyn (talk) 23:59, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.