Talk:Grief Counseling (The Office)

Grief Counseling (The Office) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Grief Counseling (The Office) is part of the The Office (American season 3) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 14, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
January 5, 2021	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage / The Office Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by The Office task force.

United States: Television Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Jim

this entire episode synopsis fails to mention what Jim was doing during the course of the episode —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.81.144.40 (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recorder song

Anyone know the name of the tune Dwight played and Pam sang? BabuBhatt 15:20, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"On The Wings Of Love" by Regine Velasquez -- Viewdrix 22:12, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll tell you the song name as soon as you explain to everyone why you keep deleteing material from this guide that people add. Last time I checked, this was the guide that "anyone can edit." At what point in time did a rule pop up saying we need approval from random God-Kings to add anything? I don't care if you build this guide from scratch, it still doesn't give you the right to dictate what belongs here and what doesn't. And because of you, a lot of valuable information keeps being removed. For example: why do you keep deleteing the movie references? That's a part of the episode info that should be included as it's own catagory, not slapped into the Synopsis like you intendedit to be there. So as soon as you explain to us why you feel you can delete whatever you wish (and be able to validate it without using the same "anyone can edit" argument I just used like so many other losers do here), I'll give you the title and artist of the song you want. Just in time for you to post it and take all the credit for knowing what it is. JohnQ.Public 20:36, 14 October 2006

Maybe because having the exact same two or three sentences worth of information in the plot summary and as a seperate pop culture references section was redundant; maybe because a "References" section is meant for sources on facts and the movie information was added mistakenly by some people there instead of a "Pop culture references" section; maybe because it's simply a judgement call on whether it can be in the plot summary or a pop culture references section, and when he saw the information was in both, he chose to keep it in one spot. Neither way is wrong, and you didn't even try to change it yourself, you simply assumed his reasoning and exploded at him like an idiot (IMO) because you like to think it makes you seem wise and important. Also, "God-Kings" is an incredibly stupid made-up word. Please don't go insane when you don't know what's even going on. Thanks. -- Viewdrix 22:08, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. And I'm pretty sure two-sentence paragraphs don't need their own subheading under wiki guidelines, but I'm not going to go find the WP:XXX thing right now. Also, the Million Dollar and Weekend at Bernies references already were included, along with Mufasa before they were added in a pointless section. And your song identification skills were clearly unneeded after all, JQ. BabuBhatt 02:55, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If it's not needed, why haven't you posted the song yet? And don't bother looking up the WP:NON-Sense thing. Those are only used by people who can't give a simple explination why they did anything, and need a rule to hide behind. And God-Kings is not a made up word, you need to get out more often. The point I was making was that those references were added alone in a References section LONG before User:BabuBhatt came along and dragged it upward. Why don't you stop assuming I'm flying off the handle, and check some of the earlier history pages. And this isn't the only episode he's done this too. You've deleted material such as Goofs and Quotes and Cultural References from all of this season's episodes, either pasting them in where they don't fit or removing them all together because you don't like it there and think it's pointless. And if you're going to deny it, I can go pull up your paper trail. All I'm saying is, don't assume it doesn't belong here because you don't like it. It's people like you that make this guide look horrible and force people to go to other sites for real info. Oh, and that song you were looking for, it's called "On The Wings Of Love." Heaven forbid you venture past the Wiki-Homeworld and type some lyrics into this website called Google. But then again I shouldn't expect more from someone who knew exactly what WP:Loophole to find in order to justify doing whatever he wants to a guide that anyone can edit, but only he can dictate what stays. JohnQ.Public 10:55, 15 October 2006

JohnQ, "God-Kings" is still a made-up word. See WP:RS. Mrtea (talk) 17:19, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't know where the Wikipedia guideline is, that's why I didn't post it. Nobody is trying to "take credit" for anything; Do you think the average reader looks at the history of who wrote what and when? It's all about making it the best page it can be. And it seems a couple other editors agree with me here; if they don't, then it gets changed back, as it's a group effort, something you don't seem to be too fond of. If you believe these other Website's guides to be that much better, why spend your time at Wikipedia? BabuBhatt 20:47, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The song wasn't needed because I already posted it. As for the most of your rant, I'm too busy laughing at the irony of both you saying I should pay attention to detail and not noticing I already wrote the song name on this page, and telling me I should get out more in order to learn a Wikipedia-niche made-up Internet phrase like "God-Kings". Now that I've read the definition, I'll note that BabuBhatt is not trying to delete the article, as the page states the definition of a God-King is. He merely kept information and moved it around to where he and others believed it was better placed. In fact, making up new criteria about what a God-King is makes you sound much more like a God-King, JohnQ. Not to mention your attempt to use non-existent authority to demand Babu explain his actions. If you feel the need to use the word "God-King" again, and furthermore, to note a definition to prove it is a "real" word, make sure you actually read that definition, and not just apply it to anyone who did the most trivial edit you disagree with. -- Viewdrix 22:10, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dunder Mifflin

I am going through several articles and changing instances of "Dunder-Mifflin" to "Dunder Mifflin" (no hyphen) as it is the proper "spelling" of the company name (see Talk page at Dunder Mifflin). Just leaving a note to say that I've gone through this page. :) Fieryrogue 16:23, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move article

May I suggest this article be moved to back to Grief Counseling (The Office episode) (currently redirect to this article) as there is now a mental health article titled Grief counseling?--Ziji (talk email) 02:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. I'm a little surprised that there's no qualifier in the article title. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robotempire (talk • contribs) 08:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copied discussion

The move occurred without the discussion above, now copied to here without deleting it from Talk:Grief Counseling--Ziji (talk email) 11:42, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Links for future use

I'm just storing some links here that I'm going to use for future references during the article's expansion.

Mastrchf (^t/_c) 15:39, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Herr's Salt and Vinegar

The Chips that Karen claims are missing from the vending machine are actually visible in the vending machine during the scene in the break room. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.54.110 (talk) 09:16, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Grief Counseling (The Office)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TBrandley (talk · contribs) 05:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Issues:

Infobox: Add running time
Production: Link executive producer
Reception: "of of" two uses of "of"
Reception: AOLTV → AOL TV
References: Ref. 8 - AOLTV → AOL TV

Good work. On hold. TBran dl ey 15:59, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I've made the appropriate fixes. Ruby 2010/2013 16:19, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Grief counseling

Grief counseling from season 3 of The Office, and Counseling from season 7. Speling12345 (talk) 3:19, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grief Counseling (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111118022009/http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-3/59065/grief-counseling/episode-304/59117 to http://www.nbc.com/the-office/episode-guide/season-3/59065/grief-counseling/episode-304/59117/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:44, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grief Counseling (The Office). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:03, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]