Talk:Gretel & Hansel

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Horror Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Score

This should be edited to make it less biased. "Chilling and frightening" is not neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.134.31.185 (talk) 05:59, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oz or Osgood

It seems that myself and Revirvlkodlaku disagree on this, so rather than getting myself caught up in an edit war I wanted to bring the discussion here. I'm not sure I understand Revirvlkodlaku's revert summary saying that a reliable outside source is needed for Perkins' credited name when the film itself is the source. The poster used in this article has a billing block that clearly shows "Osgood Perkins", as you can see in this high-res version from Imp Awards.

The film is sufficient as a source for this, as it usually is for any kind of crediting. Third-party sources aren't required for plot sections or cast members, and WP:FILMCAST explicitly says names should be "referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source". Reliable sources use both Oz and Osgood, so I feel we should be going with the credit here. I'd love to hear from Revirvlkodlaku and anyone else who has eyes on this page! Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 14:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sock, thanks for the legible film poster—this clarifies the issue, and it's all that was required. Cheers! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 16:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]