Talk:Gregory Reyes

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled

CEO of a well known company, which has an article, and conviction for backdating stock options which received significant coverage in the press (with reference) would seem like enough to avoid a speedy deletion. AugustSauce 00:12, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the speedy/hangon tags. It seems to me there is a decent assertion of notability made. A search of Google News[1] came up with a large number of sources. - Fordan (talk) 01:18, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This very much reads like a press release for the CEO. Look at the part about the trial -- very strong use of adjectives and weasel words. It hardly seems unbiased, at all.209.6.93.248 (talk) 01:53, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline doesn't add up

The article says both " After the trial’s conclusion, however, Moore recanted her testimony, claiming that she had been bullied and pressured by the prosecution to give false testimony." and "Moore's conflicting statements were not disclosed during the trial, and prosecutor Adam Reeves made numerous statements to the jury using Moore's testimony to support his argument that Reyes had deceived Brocade’s finance department[.]"

The only conflicting statements that were mentioned occurred before and after the 1st trial, so, of course the prosecutor couldn't have been hiding them the jury during the trial. JoshNarins (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]