This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article was created or expanded by Chimurenga magazine as part of the project Share Your Knowledge developed within WikiAfrica. Chimurenga contributes to WikiAfrica. The Chimurenga Library is a first source in the field and it is under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts. A copy of the license is included in the section entitled GNU Free Documentation License. Later on the website was put under CC BY-SA.
Please do not delete this page as it falls under the WikiAfrica initiative that will help to get African past and present publications onto the website.Pleaase see the GFDL License on the following link.
http://www.chimurengalibrary.co.za/gfdl_licence.php
Per suggestion, here are some ELs I added to the article. I think they belong in the article for now. I should have put them in Further reading, as they are dead-tree, like the one remaining, with CLs, rather than just web ELs. It is usual practice for such references to be added when there is a question of deletion and notability. ( been criticized for not doing so on other occasions. :-) ) As they prove the notability of the subject, being the most prominent articles about this well-known journalist found in a gnews search, I think the notability tag is out of place.John Z (talk) 05:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Because they are valid references that should be used as such instead of just shoved at the end of the article. Further reading should be extensive reading sources, such as lengthy publications, books, etc, that add significant amounts of new information, not just be a storage facility for yet to be used short references. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 22:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have to say I disagree strongly. It is accepted, longstanding and imho entirely beneficial practice to add "reference storage" and yet to be used short references, in the form of further reading and external links, especially to stubby articles, and especially to ones which are in danger of deletion, simply in order to prove notability. The characterization of further reading above is not supported by Wikipedia:Layout#Further_reading or anywhere else to my knowledge. The goal is not to write a mythical perfect article at once, but to work toward creating one in collaboration. Cheers,John Z (talk) 23:39, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see it as being useful at all, but more of a sign that we (collective we, as in Wikipedia editors) were to lazy to actually write up the article to incorporate the text. Particularly on an article like this which is already nothing more than a copy/paste from some other site. That isn't even an attempt at a decent article. Its borrowed content, even if under GFDL, and pure lazy editing that shows a complete lack of concern for the topic. -- AnmaFinotera (talk·contribs) 23:42, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
