Talk:Greenwich Peninsula

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Surrounding area

The comment on the edit to opening paragraph by 83.217.190.139 says New Charlton is obsolete. The Ordnance Survey and the Greenwich Guide (paragraph 8 "..The area along the riverside is primarily an industrial zone, and is known as New Charlton.") don't agree. Would others with local knowledge care to comment? Pterre (talk) 14:35, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, as of October 2007, the term "New Charlton" the term is still used. It's now primarily a retail shopping area along Bugbys Way.--TGC55 (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blackwall Peninsula

This name was used by Paul Barker (senior research fellow of the Young Foundation, formerly the Institute of Community Studies[1][2][3]) in a New Statesman article in 1997, and in I'd put my money on the rough edges of the Wheel, The Independent, 15 December 1999. In the latter he stated that the Dome's existence would, it was hoped, cancel out the blight over what was, in pre-Dome maps, always called the Blackwall Peninsula (no mention of Greenwich). User:Pterre has demonstrated on my talk page that the latter claim is incorrect.

The LDDC also used "Blackwall Peninsula" for the Greenwich one: see Improving connections to Docklands and Figure 16. Confusingly, they also used that name at least once for a completely different peninsula in the River Lea; more details are on my talk page linked above, in case anyone is interested. Anyway, the use of the name in the House of Commons justifies redirecting Blackwall Peninsula here. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

TfL buildings?

As of late 2009, there are two new large office buildings east of the O2, which are primarily occupied by Transport for London offices. This is worth a mention in the article. However, I don't have any references at hand which could be used to update this article.--TGC55 (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just added some details on the TfL building and on Ravensbourne College Paul W (talk) 12:18, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenwich Peninsula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100912182337/http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/media/newscentre/archive/16125.aspx to http://www.tfl.gov.uk/corporate/media/newscentre/archive/16125.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:38, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenwich Peninsula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100502090850/http://www.history.rochester.edu/ehp-book/shb/hb21.htm to http://www.history.rochester.edu/ehp-book/shb/hb21.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:47, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]