Talk:Greenock Blitz

Military history: British / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Excuse me Wikipedia, but if Greenock suffered a Blitz that was slightly less heavier than Clydebank, then surely there should be a page on the Clydebank Blitz and the effects on shipbuilding and the munitions plants in Clydebank.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greenock Blitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130703145732/http://homepage.ntlworld.com/le.houstons/gnkrev/ to http://homepage.ntlworld.com/le.houstons/gnkrev/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:07, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Busiest port in the world" claim

I added a citation requirement for the claim that Greenock was the busiest port in the world (during WW2 I presume). The term 'busiest' needs to be defined- Highest numbers of ships visiting? Largest amount of cargo tonnage? Most passengers? Londonclanger (talk) 15:54, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]