Talk:Greenbird
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Greenbird appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 April 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
visuals
[edit]This article really needs one or more photographs of the vehicle, as its design is so unusual that a textual description really doesn't do it justice. Anybody got one? An aerodynamic diagram would be useful, too. --Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Greenbird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090330061202/http://blog.greenbird.co.uk/2009/03/27/greenbird-smashes-world-record/ to http://blog.greenbird.co.uk/2009/03/27/greenbird-smashes-world-record
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:19, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Wind speed?
[edit]A claim of highest speed is meaningless without the wind speed it used.It is claimed to go several times faster than the wind. There has probably been a bicycle flung faster by a tornado. Was the speed monitored and reported?Edison (talk) 20:56, 5 January 2020 (UTC)
- The claim is for a land-speed record, not the fastest object ever blown by the wind. The report on the speed runs is here. It includes windspeed. BTW a Talk page is to discuss the article, not to comment on its contents. Do you have a suggestion for improving the article? Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 01:20, 6 January 2020 (UTC)