Talk:Green library

A fact from Green library appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2007, and was viewed approximately 557 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the National Library of Singapore (pictured), the Seattle Central Library, and Minneapolis Central Library are examples of green libraries, using environmentally conscious designs?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/December.

Wikipedia

Libraries Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related redirect is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Umm, incomplete sentences? Yikes. I don't have time to go through it right now (at work), but someone should have a look with an eye to repair the less than perfect grammar. 67.142.130.21 (talk) 00:49, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page numbers

While we're still close to the time you created this... can you please add the page numbers for your citations? gren グレン 02:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added POV tag

Large portions of this article are not neutral under Wikipedia guidelines, especially the paragraphs in the 'Why are libraries becoming green?' section. I suggest we move to make these paragraphs (along with the rest of the article) as neutral as possible. Esahr (talk) 22:43, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation problems

Please use the reference style used in wikipedia Wikipedia:Cite, all the reference links are broken--Thorseth (talk) 07:50, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See "Sands 2002" and "Lamis2003" for an examples of the correct usage--Thorseth (talk) 08:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:04, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]