Talk:GreenPlumbers

This page was proposed for deletion by Ravenswing (talk · contribs) on 22 July 2020 with the comment:
NN organization, fails the GNG and WP:ORG. Next to no sources found, and none with significant coverage; the only two I did find were namedrops. Seems to be a magnet for adspam, much of which has been excised in the article's history, but much which has still been added in. Notability tagged for over a decade. Created by SPA whose sole Wikipedia activity this was.
It was contested by Kvng (talk · contribs) on 2020-07-28 with the comment:
Spam magnet and SPA are not valid WP:DEL-REASONs. Numerous hits in Books search. Other sources deserve evaluation by other editors.

Environment Low‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal GreenPlumbers is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Please add some reliable references!

There's been a notability warning on this article for a few years. All it's got are links to the organization's own websites which suggests a either lack of imagination or a lack of notability. If anyone cares about this article I suggest they add some reliable secondary sources to establish its notability. I didn't find anything in the news about it but they're mentioned in a number of books. I don't have time to work here but hope someone does. Joja lozzo 14:49, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]