Talk:Greek battleship Kilkis/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 00:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get to this in the next day or two.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Should this article really be split from that of the Mississippi?

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
Missing something here: The ship was attacked Salamis Naval Base by

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Publisher location for Brassey.
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
You've got displacement in metric tons when it should be long tons. Link Babcock & Wilcox, dive bomber. Add |adj=on to the convert templates for the guns in the infobox.

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Should all be fixed. Thanks for the review, Sturm. Parsecboy (talk) 21:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite welcome.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:37, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]