Talk:Great Wheal Fortune

Cornwall Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornwall, an attempt to improve and expand Wikipedia coverage of Cornwall and all things Cornish. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project member page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.CornwallWikipedia:WikiProject CornwallTemplate:WikiProject CornwallCornwall-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

See drop-down box for suggested article edit guidelines:

Be bold - if you know something about Cornwall then put it in! We value your contributions and don't be afraid if your spelling isn't great as there are plenty of spelling and grammar experts on clean-up duty!
Articles on settlements in Cornwall should be written using the standard set of headings approved by the UK geography WikiProject's guideline How to write about settlements.
At WikiProject Cornwall we subscribe to the policies laid down by Wikipedia - particularly civility and consensus building. We are aware that the wording on Cornish entries can sometimes be a contentious topic, especially those concerning geography. You don't have to agree with everything but there is no excuse for rudeness and these things are best solved through consensus building and compromise. For more information see WP:CornwallGuideline.
These pages are not platforms for political discussion. Issues relating to Cornish politics should be restricted to those pages that directly deal with these issues (such as Constitutional status of Cornwall, Cornish nationalism, etc) and should not overflow into other articles.
Most of all have fun editing - that's the reason we all do this, right?!

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mining Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Great Wheal Fortune be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Cornwall may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from Great Wheal Fortune appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 March 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a lone miner is said to have extracted two sacks of wolframite each day from the waste tips of the disused Great Wheal Fortune mine in Cornwall?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2012/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Great Wheal Fortune.

Wikipedia

Wolfram

The 'lone miner' in the 1950s would have been taking sacks of wolframite from the spoil heaps, not wolfram (tungsten), which as far as I can tell does not occur in a native metal form. I presume that the source says wolframite, but I don't have access to it to check. Mikenorton (talk) 19:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The source says wolfram I'm afraid. Jowaninpensans (talk) 21:43, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tricky, because the source must be wrong - but "verifiability not truth", is I know the requirement. Mikenorton (talk) 22:02, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Brown and Acton do not give a ref but the final paragraph is ″For a detailed history of Great Wheal Fortune see Justin Brooke's article in the Trevithick Society's Newsletter 14 (8/76), reprinted in Newsletter 40 of the Carn Brea Mining Society (6/98). Probably in one of my local libraries but I won't won't get the chance to check for a few days. Jowaninpensans (talk) 22:59, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked the Trevithick Society's Newsletters to see if there is any more information on the 1950's miner but no mention I'm afraid. Jowaninpensans (talk) 15:51, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've discovered that 'Wolfram' was at one time used for the mineral [1], at least at the end of the 19th century, so perhaps that use persisted. Mikenorton (talk) 23:08, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kevmin has also found a link to a Mindat page that says 'wolfram' is used as a synonym for 'wolframite' in English, so I've changed the link to point there. Mikenorton (talk) 08:13, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

KevinMcE has now changed the last sentence to say 'wolframite' explicitly, which is fair enough - no need for us to use somewhat archaic language. Mikenorton (talk) 15:45, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Great Wheal Fortune. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120505221842/http://www.cornwallinfocus.co.uk/history/fortune.php to http://www.cornwallinfocus.co.uk/history/fortune.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:49, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]