Talk:Great Slave Auction

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Great Slave Auction article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on March 2, 2022 and March 2, 2023.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Camilla Latin.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 4 September 2019 and 18 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jrichter0356. Peer reviewers: Livlock, Alex J Brickley.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:10, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Primary Sources

I would offer these links to primary sources on this topic. I am not certain how to expand on the historiography.

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83030213/1859-03-09/ed-1/seq-5/

http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85058130/1894-08-19/ed-1/seq-3/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ediza8 (talk • contribs) 22:26, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Naive question

If Butler's trustees had control over his plantations and his slaves, and needed to raise money, wouldn't it make more sense to sell the plantations with the slaves who worked there? Selling the slaves and plantations separately seems to serve no-one's interests. Maproom (talk) 09:04, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Hands"

I removed the sentence about "hands" being used because they were not seen as human. The term "hands" has been used since medieval times to describe agricultural workers. It has nothing to do with race. See https://www.etymonline.com/word/hand. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 18:59, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. Or it describes anyone doing manual labor. "All hands on deck." Bubba73 ^{You talkin' to me?} 19:24, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The first picture here is at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierce_Butler#Pierce_Mease_Butler also, but they have different titles for the lady in the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.99.172.160 (talk) 20:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Largest Slave Sale in Georgia History Historical Marker.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Largest Slave Sale in Georgia History Historical Marker.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:22, 2 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Enslaved Africans"

I believe that the term "enslaved Africans" ought to be replaced with "enslaved people" (or simply "slaves"), unless it refers to actual first-generation African slaves brought over through the trans-Atlantic slave trade. My knowledge on this particular subject is rather lacking, so I don't know for certain whether or not it involved Africans, but considering the late date and the sheer scale of the body of enslaved workers involved, I am guessing it wasn't. Making the above edit would be in line with current academic custom, which distinguishes between those enslaved in Africa, and bondspeople bought and sold through the internal slave market, who might have been in America for generations and would have had a very different culture and life experiences. Considering this term is used very early in the article's introduction, I do not believe it can be left up to context to clear up any confusion. CatAppreciator29 (talk) 17:50, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think the first usage should be "enslaved African Americans", to emphasize the racial aspect, which is a key part of any article involving slavery in the United States. I agree that enslaved Africans seems to be inaccurate, but just "enslaved people" assumes knowledge and leaves out important context.--Cerebral726 (talk) 18:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]