Talk:Great Seto Bridge
This level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The name of the bridge
[edit]Is this bridge really referred to as the Seto-Ohashi Bridge in English? Doesn't the 大橋 (Ō-hashi) part of 瀬戸大橋 (Seto Ō-hashi) already mean bridge? Hence I would've thought referring to it as the Seto-Ohashi Bridge would be like saying Mt Fujiyama or ATM machine. Stephen Mok 18:45, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- You're right, it is like saying "ATM Machine" ("Mt Fujiyama" is even weirder, since it's "Fujisan" in Japanese). Not sure whether anyone calls it that or not, but if they do, it's reasonable for the article to make reference to it. The article does use "Great Seto Bridge" as the primary name. adamrice 19:05, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I was about to make the same comment but since you've already mentioned it I'll go back to sipping my chai tea latte with milk. If nobody can find a ref for this misnomer, let's remove it. JIMp talk·cont 04:25, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Here a ref for it
- JIMp talk·cont 04:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Improvements
[edit]This is really a beautiful bridge. The views are beautiful when the fog and clouds do not close in. The "Trivia" section should be renamed "Bridge Stats" or something similar. Or maybe moved into a info box. See: Akashi-Kaikyō Bridge The use of a map would be very helpful. By comparing how other bridge articles are done, this article can be improved. This can be a great article. Good start! Please continue to work on it. Enfermero (talk) 20:32, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
More Pictures Availible
[edit]I don't want to mess the page so I hope someone can edit the page.
Some Improvementssuggestions:
There is no picture of the Yoshima Bridge
Here are some suggestions:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC01037.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC01031.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC00995.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC00992.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC00954.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC00921.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.YoshimaBridge.DSC00941.jpg
There is no picture of the Bannoshu Viaduct + other viaduct.
The Bannoshu Viaduct, South part of the Great Seto Bridge, is also going over vater and is an important part of the Great Seto Bridge. Total length 480 m Span lengths 150 m, 180 m, 150 m
Here are some suggestions:
Train in the viaduct/bridge: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01847.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01818.jpg
"Pillar" https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01816.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01815.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01812.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Great_Seto_Bridge,_Bannoshu_Viaduct_DSC01850.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Great_Seto_Bridge,_Bannoshu_Viaduct_DSC01838.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Great_Seto_Bridge,_Bannoshu_Viaduct_DSC01820.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Great_Seto_Bridge,_Bannoshu_Viaduct_DSC00998.jpg
Some suggestions of Panorama from South:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01854.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01846.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01840.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01833.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01829.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:GreatSetoBridge.DSC01827.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johan Eneland (talk • contribs) 20:53, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]These six named bridges have their own stubby little articles. Each of these articles is a copy-and-paste of each other with the details changed. Why do we need this? Let's just merge them all here. JIMp talk·cont 05:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support. That sounds sensible to me. I can't see much scope for expanding any of the individual bridge articles. --DAJF (talk) 05:13, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Sounds reasonable. They're all parts of one bridge system, and the final article would have a better chance of reaching B-class than all the separate stubs. Boneyard90 (talk) 17:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Done. JIMp talk·cont 00:12, 11 January 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Great Seto Bridge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081212222815/http://www.jb-honshi.co.jp/press/080520press-1.html to http://www.jb-honshi.co.jp/press/080520press-1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
"Scientists" more likely engineers
[edit]Scientists began investigations shortly after
They were more likely to have been engineers: civil, structural and geotechnical engineers. Jono from oz (talk) 08:26, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Technology
- Start-Class vital articles in Technology
- Start-Class Japan-related articles
- Mid-importance Japan-related articles
- WikiProject Japan articles
- Start-Class Bridge and Tunnel articles
- Mid-importance Bridge and Tunnel articles
- WikiProject Bridges and Tunnels articles